The Affidavits

Parts 1 and 2 together.

Jan 02, 2023

The same notary public stamps and signatures on different documents.

The story of Jessie Czebotar’s affidavits was originally posted on two parts on my blog, Outward Trends. This repost with updates has combined both #1 and #2. This long article is an investigation regarding the validity of the documents themselves since they feature numerous questionable flaws. Part 2 will cover some of the content of the actual affidavits.

Introduction

Jessie Czebotar has had some ups and downs in 2022. From losing two video channel supporters to having a dust up and falling out with Madyson Marquette. Myself and other researchers have been unrelenting in exposing her deceitful conduct, lying and endless grifting. So annoyed with critics she even stooped to posting an enemies list on Twitter, of which my name was included. In the spring she posted a “cease and desist” notice on Twitter towards me and several other online critics, three times. They had no legal standing since her claims of being a Federal witness were exaggerated. All she actually did was submit an affidavit to a civil trial that was a tort case, which was never used. She also had to take down her Go Fund Me “Champions” account after raising $20,000. GFM became curious and started asking questions regarding how the money was being spent to help others. Being alleged whistleblowers Jessie responded she could not release their names due to obvious reasons.

To be fair, she has had some high points such as reaching over 32,000 followers on Twitter, launching a new website (she owns a total of three), numerous workshops including one recorded in a TV studio charging $400 a seat. Her fundraising is ongoing, helped along by book sales and merchandise. How much money is flowing into the Illuminate the Darkness ministry is unknown.

For some reason that is not perfectly clear, Jessie Czebotar has released a series of affidavits, many produced in 2021 and only appearing online recently. There are plenty of people providing opposition to her claims, most unverifiable. So this could be an attempt to add further legitimacy to her various claims and her status as an alleged whistleblower to Satanic crimes of torture and murder of children.

What follows is an analysis of those affidavits which will show numerous errors, both in the composition of the documents themselves to factual anomalies and in one case, blatant slander.

Are The Affidavits Null And Void?

Part of a notary public’s job is being a witness. The witness signing must correlate to the notary public seeing the signature being made and making his/her signature, date and stamp on the affidavit. Both dates should match. If the signature is a day or two apart then the notary is not witnessing it. There is an old system for signature verification but remains legally valid. Also, additional information may be required such as the notary public making it clear they were witnessing the signature being made.

Below is an affidavit of mine for a probate proceeding in 2016. The dates are the same. The notary public has the added paragraph describing exactly what he was doing in regard to verifying that the witness, me, has signed and dated the document. My street address (blurred) is included. Proper dating, dates and addresses are important since a Judge is going to see this when it is filed with the court.

One of Jessie's affidavits. Is she really submitted her affidavits to various courts they should be of the same quality and detail as mine. They are not. They resemble digital hack jobs. No street address and the witnessing dates are off by one day in this example.

An example of a 2-day difference between her signature and that of the notary public. This shows that the notary did not view her signing.

As shown in the next example the signatures and notary stamps are taken from a batch of 7 affidavits and are all identical, giving the appearance of digital alteration. Signatures and stamps will have variations. In Jessie’s affidavits there are no variations whatsoever, only general conformity. Notice the two day signature difference. A cut & paste job.

Likewise, the cover letter is also problematic.

Once again the signature dates are off by a day and the use of two notary public stamps is unnecessary. Both stamps are nearly identical and are very likely digital inserts.

Even Jessie’s diehard supporters such Veronica Swift can’t admit there is trouble with the verification of these documents even with clear irregularities:

“I also looked through the Florida reference manual for notaries public, as one attorney and certified notary from Florida also claimed on Twitter that all of these affidavits were null and void because of the day difference between the witness and notary signatures, and I was unable to find any official instructions that would prohibit notarizing an affidavit a day later under these state guidelines.”

Here is Swift with both an attorney and certified notary telling her a dating difference would make an affidavit null and void and she still won’t accept it! Like most Jessie gatekeepers she can’t. Besides, her job as a propagandist is to defend the cult Leader from her critics. It’s a tough job with Jessie constantly offering dubious evidence that doesn’t hold up well or at all when exposed to the light.

In Closing

These allegedly sworn affidavits of Jessie Czebotar are troublesome. If you know anything about her, you will know she doesn’t do much of anything in a normal manner to begin with. So having issues with affidavits and the proper use of signatures and notary stamps are of no surprise. The same will occur in the Part 2, when the content is examined.

Notes

01.17.23

I found out something new about Veronica Swift. She’s very sneaky. In her attempts to defend Jessie, she went so far as to claim affidavit signing dates being off by a day were valid by only capturing the top part of the page in the American Society of Notaries website. She posted the paragraph in parentheses in the picture to the left. However, if you scroll the page down it clearly states "an oath or affirmation MUST be signed in the presence of the notary." Jessie does nothing but affirmations in her affidavits! Swift only posted the upper part of the page to make it appear as if the signatures being incorrect were acceptable. They are not and hence, invalid.

Source: https://www.asnnotary.org/?form=basicduties

10.15.22

Image use granted under CCL and used for non-commercial reasons.

Sources

Blog source

https://liftingthewool.wordpress.com/2022/09/16/every-jessie-czebotar-affidavit/

Notary Public

https://www.superiornotaryservices.com/blog/notary-public-witness/

Part 2

In Part 1, the Jessie Czebotar affidavits show a consistent flow of errors in notary public stamps, signatures and signature dates. In Part 2, we will explore the content of some of the affidavits, which are Jessie’s alleged witness stories.

The Content

I will only briefly describe some of the content in these affidavits due to the nightmarish images they invoke and may be trigging for some people. Jessie’s tales could be best described as horror fairy tales. It details unimaginable suffering and the most bizarre one could ever read. That a child could remember all of these garish and traumatic details is highly questionable. People are known to succumb to blackouts as the brain temporarily shuts down from the trauma of witnessing these described horrors. It’s called a transom.

There is a litany of horrors from graphic rape and torture scenes range from Hillary Clinton ripping a young girl’s face off and wearing it on her own face as a mask; former president Bush (41) scooping up a live child’s brains and eating them; shipping dead children on iced via the US Mail to cannibalized. Some of these scenes are similar to Jessie’s fetish for horror films, the x-rated depraved ones.

Once again she has her grandmother Clara Church, alleged Mother of Darkness committing ritualistic killings of children with Jessie as witness. 1,000 a month. She never states reporting these atrocities to law enforcement, nor how one has the time to view over 30 kids being killed everyday for weeks and months on end. And the psychological impact would have been enormous. Such as it was for the Russian officer that was tasked with executing the captured Polish officers at the start of WWII. He personally shot 5,000 of them. Then he became 5,001 when he shot himself.

Analysis

It must be noted that Jessie’s alleged eye witness accounts of life in a satanic cult is her story. There are little to no evidence to back up her claims. She has a habit of taking existing stories and combining them with her own or outright adding them on. Jessie’s story of witnessing Hillary Clinton ripping a young girl’s face off and wearing it as a mask largely has already been told, yet not proven, from an alleged video on Anthony Weiner’s laptop was secured and seen by NYC police detectives. Which also means the timeline for this is way off. But it’s an example of her borrowing a story, real or not, and adding it to her own narrative.

My main issue with these sworn statements is the long history we have of Jessie lying. From my research and proof I have found and posted here, along with others, it is hard for me to believe any of the horrid tales are true. However, I do consider these things can happen but are hidden away from us and only a select elite, all headed for hell, do this. There is power derived from evil or else no one would participate in it.

As always, where is the proof? It’s all a huge group of stories with no evidence and no corroborating witnesses. These affidavits are supposed to have been sworn under oath. To whom? Where? What date?

Basically, these are a disgusting collection of horror tales from somebody who loves disgusting slasher films.

Military Use of Civilian Affidavits?

Jessie Czebotar reveals she has been spreading her Affidavits about numerous government and military institutions. In particular, U.S. Army at Fort Campbell.

Submitting affidavits to military courts offers a unique set of problems. Such as, when, where and how? What military court exactly? Where was the location? What time period? What case? This is about as vague as a host of other stories Jessie tells. These affidavits of hers all allege crimes by civilians. A military court tries military personnel only and would only try civilians if they are considered enemy combatants or considered to be aiding and abetting the enemies of the United States. So unless she is a witness to crimes committed by military men or women, there is not much they can do with these documents except forward them to Federal law enforcement. As can be clearly seen, none of these affidavits deal with military people.

Analysis

There is nothing here. Jessie appears to be influenced by the Q movement since it promoted the notion of military involvement in law enforcement issues (i.e., prosecuting pedophiles and supposedly rescuing children). The military is not placing pedophiles on trial in military courts. Sending affidavits to the military would be a useless enterprise and we only have Jessie’s word she did so. If she had been working with an actual attorney, he would have told her to knock it off.

Lucien Greaves--Doug Mesner--Douglas Misicko

Lucien Greaves Illuminati Assassin

The co-founder of the Satanic Temple Lucien Greaves (alias) gets a huge mention in the affidavits. He is everything from a childhood training partner to rising to the head of security for the top Illuminati leadership, The Mothers of Darkness. A person given the authority to kill if necessary.

He features a long history of using the internet and social media to deny SRA (Satanic Ritual Abuse as “satanic panic.” That is why it’s such an odd pairing with Jessie since her story is one of being an SRA survivor. In her numerous tweets with him, this contradiction in views is never mentioned. If anything, she sides with Lucien’s agenda which can be at odds with her own ministry efforts.

Lucien Greaves is a meandering of opposites. He portrays himself as a liberal but has freely associated in his past with Neo nazis and has designed illustrations for a Neo Nazi publisher. He goes about saying “Hail Satan” while saying that he doesn’t believe the devil really exists. He will pay to attend a conference on SRA so as to write a hit piece on it, only to cancel the check afterward.

These accusations have been gaining ground online for months till Lucien Greaves felt the need to post a reply, entitled The "I" in the Center of the Storm. Not clearly a rebuttal as he said, “…my denial of individual claims will do nothing to confront the distortions in their thinking that would lead them to need me to point out the obvious fantastical nature of these stories to begin with.“ He added it would be "...simply a waste of time for me that serves to indulge them."

So Greaves sees a defense of these allegations as useless. I would assume he understands quite well that Jessie is a promoter of fiction when it comes to her life story. As others become more aware the impact—if there is any impact at all—of these yarns will fade. If you want to believe he is a stone cold killer then do so. He ends his Patreon piece mocking Jessie’s affidavits as “an elaborate tale of my Illuminati occult mafia past.”

He did point out an error in the affidavit regarding the listing of his middle name of Killrush a name he reports never having used.

Analysis

As usual with Jessie Czebotar can craft some amazing and horrifying tales. Lucien Greaves rightly considers it too ridiculous to comment on as his followers do as well. However, one thing was important, the middle name he says he never uses. This is another example of blogger Veronica Swift quoting Jessie without fact checking first. Swift gets shafted a lot with blind devotion to her Hero. (And to think she once called me be a bad researcher!)

Basically, Lucien Greaves considers the things said of him to be a fabrication. In effect, Jessie Czebotar lied.

It’s Douglas Misicko—Not Douglas Mysecko

Lucien Greaves is a man of many names. There is Doug Mesner which has made the rounds, Douglas Mysecko and the latest one, Douglas Misicko.

According to Daniel K. Buntovnik in his blog article "The Frontman: Douglas Misicko, better known as Lucien Greaves and Doug Mesner,' state that Douglas Misicko is Lucien Greaves actual name. The source being the Church of Satan. It’s known that the Temple and the Church are rivals in the world of satanic religion. The Church of Satan evidently enjoyed some minor doxxing of Lucien which he was not pleased about even though his actual name had been outed in several articles years earlier.

Jessie in her affidavits prefers the Douglas Mysecko surname. Various searches (which does include an identity search site) find nothing on this name. Buntovnik in his article above never mentions the Mysecko surname either. It’s a typical trait of Jessie’s to misname things and people, or mispronounce them. She even has the habit of misspelling my name when mentioning me. I find it hard to believe this is done by accident and it remains a mystery.

Nevertheless, it is important that an affidavit be accurate in the stating of facts. Providing the wrong names would mislead an investigation (if one is being conducted) or cause a witness’s testimony, this case hers, to be dismissed.

Analysis

It’s clear that Douglas Misicko is the actual name for Lucien Greaves. It’s unclear why Jessie continues to word play with incorrect names of people. That includes places and things. Such as pronouncing Glamis Castle as it is spelled but not as the true pronunciation, “Glamz”. Or referring to witch Laurie Cabot as Laurie Cabot Kent. Cabot never refers to the surname of Kent in any of her interviews, books, social media, websites, etc.

Like everything else with Jessie’s affidavits it’s all a story with little to back it up.

The Slandering of James F. Volpe

Former Weaton Police Chief James P. Volpe — Former Chief of Police James F. Volpe.

Jessie Czebotar has long been naming famous people and celebrities of being involved with satanism and satanic practices. Dozens of them. Lately, Elon Musk is one of her favorite whipping boys. Hillary Clinton is targeted as a fiendish torturer and murderer of children. So far, nobody has filed a slander or defamation suit against her. Many probably don’t know she exists. Not famous enough? Of course, many famous people are rumored to be involved with the Dark Arts and some will openly admit to it.

However, I believe this is the first time Jessie names someone not famous. In this instance retired Wheaton, Illinois Chief of Police James F. Volpe. Originally Jessie did not name him in her stories but finally did in her affidavit release. In her affidavit statements she accuses him of murder, child rape and murder of the girl’s parents. Two of their sons were spared, one of whom she identifies as Douglas Mysecko (Misicko).

This is the definition of slander:

n. oral defamation, in which someone tells one or more persons an untruth about another which untruth will harm the reputation of the person defamed. Slander is a civil wrong (tort) and can be the basis for a lawsuit. Damages (payoff for worth) for slander may be limited to actual (special) damages unless there is malicious intent, since such damages are usually difficult to specify and harder to prove. Some statements such as an untrue accusation of having committed a crime, having a loathsome disease, or being unable to perform one's occupation are treated as slander per se since the harm and malice are obvious, and therefore usually result in general and even punitive damage recovery by the person harmed. Words spoken over the air on television or radio are treated as libel (written defamation) and not slander on the theory that broadcasting reaches a large audience as much if not more than printed publications.

Placed in bold is malicious intent, which in this case is clearly evident. I am surprised that Jessie would take the path. Is she this confident in being able to back up her assertion that James Volpe is a murderer and rapist? If not, it’s a dumb play and could lead to the ruination of her ministry and reputation among her followers. All it needs is a challenge in court.

By all accounts, James Volpe served his community faithfully. There is no hint of wrongdoing or issues regarding his work as a police officer before rising to chief or after. Before entering law enforcement, he earned a bachelor of science degree in education from Illinois State University in 1980 and juris doctorate (JD) at DePaul University Law School in 1992.

Analysis

The making of wild claims with malicious intent towards others, great and small, should alarm many. Nothing Jessie says good, ill, or false affects her supporters. They would believe her if she said the earth was flat. However, someone personally affected by this would have little recourse but to take legal measures to task. Perhaps Volpe is as ignorant of his character being defamed as Elon Musk and a host of famous people are.

Lastly

As demonstrated in Part 1, there are gross errors in the signatures and notary public stamps. The signatures and notary stamps have the uniform appearance of being digital copies. Many of the signature dates are off by a day or two, meaning the notary public was not witnessing the signing taking place. This brings into question the legitimacy of the documents. This should raise concern with any Judge viewing them.

The so-called eye witness reports by Jessie Czebotar involving horrific torture, rape and murder of children in satanic rituals are still just her accounts. There is a growing amount of evidence and witness testimony that these horrors occur. But ultimately we are left with one person’s story who has a substantial record of lying. Take it with a grain of salt.

And apparently, the starry-eyed Jessie follower above did not and considers the affidavits, shown now replete with flaws, to be almost as great as the Holy Bible. It’s an alarming development of extreme deception with an uncertain solution.

The Final Word

In parting Lucien Greaves makes a cogent point regarding affidavits.

"It is also weirdly common that conspiracists will seek to have affidavits of their claims notarized (as we see here), perhaps because they feel that the notary seal is an official endorsement of credibility? I am not sure. In any case, in case you were not aware, a notary simply attests that the submission originated from the person that the document is attributed to. It is emphatically not a judgement of the truthfulness of the claims that any document may make."

Notes

10.29.22

1) Jessie Czebotar’s affidavits were allegedly escrowed by Randi Erickson a former “Truth and Taxation” judge, in U.S. courts in Minnesota and the U.S. Army at Fort Campbell (others include the governor of Texas and other law enforcement agencies). I have found no evidence of this type of judge. Appears to be Sovereign Citizen nonsense. There is embedded in many state taxing authorities a “Truth-in-Taxation” procedure for doing hearings of annual budgets for the upcoming year.

Also, found no evidence these affidavits were actually filed.

2) In July of 2022, Jessie said the total number of children she witnessed being killed was 136,000 (and counting them from age 4 1/2). This number is left out of her affidavit releases all dated to the year 2021. Why? She still states her grandmother’s sacrificing of 1,000 children a month.

3) Lists numerous places where children are either kept or placed in ritual situations and killed. Which included everything from St Mary by the Sea Catholic Church, the Vapor Voo Doo E-Cig shop to the Carlsbad Observatory. Keep in mind these are stories. She can say whatever she likes she has no real proof for any of these places being used by the Luciferian Brotherhood or that children are being killed there.

08.08.23

Also just discovered that Jessie has blatantly lied in her account of the killing of Lucien Grieves (Douglas Misicko) father, mother and sister by using the wrong names except for Douglas. Other than Douglas (Lucien) all names are false. She does this fully aware she is under threat of perjury for making false statements on a sworn affidavit. And she does it anyway.

Here, in his father's OB are the real names of his wife and children. As follows: Thomas (deceased), Sylvia (wife), siblings Greg, Doug and Cathy. Mother and all siblings are alive.

Here are the false names Jessie uses: Parents, Todd and Sarah. Siblings, Peter and Alice.

01.01.24

The update to this post is The Affidavits Revisited.

The Affidavits - Revisited

George Bailey

September 20, 2023

As I have said about the Jessie Czebotar affidavits, if there was ever a guide written on how to not write and submit legal documents such as these, it would be Jessie’s affidavits. As myself and other researchers have discovered they are a huge mess, unprofessionally and incompetently drafted.…

Read full story